NLWC News


Conservation Commission Permits Geotube Expansion

Anna Day • April 4, 2025

Nantucket Community Can Vote NO at Upcoming Annual Town Meeting

After nearly 15 months, the Conservation Commission closed the public hearing on the joint SBPF - Town of Nantucket Notice of Intent (NOI) application to extend the existing installation of geotubes on the public beach four times its length to approximately 4,000 linear feet along the base of the Sconset Bluff.  The Commission formally voted (4-1) to issue an Order of Conditions (OOC) permitting the proposed project with conditions.

As data collected by project consultants indicates,
the geotubes are detrimental to the environment, increasing the erosion on surrounding beaches.  The NLWC takes the strong position that there are much more appropriate and less harmful alternatives,  especially given that the Town’s engineers have determined the relocation of Baxter Road can be completed by 2027.

The NLWC participated throughout the hearing process
  submitting seven written comment letters in addition to a multitude of public comments made with our professional consulting coastal engineer Trey Ruthven of Sustainable Coastal Solutions.

The NLWC does not agree with the Commission's final determination
that the project meets the necessary waiver criteria to receive a permit, and that the mitigation sand required by the permit will be sufficient to prevent long term negative impacts to our beaches and eastern shoreline. The Commission Chair cast the lone dissenting vote under the local wetlands bylaw.

One of the most critical issues
  addressed by the Commission in the OOC is the ever-growing deficit of mitigation sand that was required by the previous permit for the existing geotubes, which SBPF has steadfastly refused to provide. The mitigation conditioned in the previous permit was determined with SBPF’s own data, supported by MA DEP, and agreed to by SBPF.  It has been demonstrated by two independent coastal engineering experts that the failure to contribute the required mitigation has already resulted in significant damage to the Town-owned coastal beach  as well as privately owned properties to the north. This includes existing and increased future risk to the Lighthouseproperty. This violation of SBPF’s existing permit resulted in a removal order which was upheld by Superior Court, and is still outstanding.

The Commission did include a condition in the OOC requiring SBPF to provide the deficit, at least 105,465 cubic yards of sand, to the system.
However, they are allowing SBPF a period of 10 years to deliver the mitigation that was a requirement of their prior permit,  and the plan for how this is to be accomplished has yet to be determined. The applicants are required to provide such a plan for Commission approval.

The project’s path forward is not entirely clear. The Select Board must negotiate a new Memorandum of Understanding with SBPF and ultimately draft and vote on a new license agreement. Before they can do so, the Town of Nantucket must secure a positive vote on Article 81 from Town Meeting for permission to lease/license our Town owned beach to SBPF for the construction.
The NLWC strongly opposes Article 81 and the authorization of a lease/license of the public beach for this project.  We opposed the geotube expansion and we are opposed to the Article as drafted because not only would it allow the expansion but it is also too broad. Article 81 would undermine Annual Town Meeting’s ability to exert influence on alternative erosion control projects at this location in the future.
 

Nantucket Needs Your Presence & Support at Annual Town Meeting (ATM), which begins on Saturday, May 3rd to Vote this Article Down! 
Please Mark Your Calendars for ATM and Stay tuned for further updates and more information on our opposition to Article 81!


Resources:

Throughout the public hearing process the Conservation Commission was provided with a multitude of submissions from the NLWC's Coastal Engineer Trey Ruthven of Sustainable Coastal Solutions, and the Greenhill's Coastal Engineer Dr. David Kriebel as well as members of the public. All of the submissions from the hearing can be found through the Town's website.


We would like to highlight several submissions clearly demonstrating the negative impacts that geotubes have had on the adjacent beach as well as the downdrift coastal bank.

1. Slideshow: Impact of the Geotube on the Beaches of Nantucket's Eastern Shore, submitted by Dr. David Kriebel on August 2, 2024

2. Report: Impact of the Geotubes on the Beaches of Nantucket's Eastern Shore, submitted by Dr. David Kriebel on August 2, 2024

3. Visualization: Quantifying the Sand Deficit & Mitigating Sand vs Downdrift Loss, submitted by Nantucket resident Doug Rose on September 19, 2024

4. Visualization: Sconset Beach after a Decade of Geotubes, submitted by Nantucket resident Doug Rose on January 10, 2025

December 22, 2025
As the end of the Fall season approaches, we would like to take some time to reflect on Nantucket’s recent Special Town Meeting, held on November 4th. The Nantucket Land & Water Council has been engaged in Nantucket’s discussion about short-term rental (STR) policy and regulation for many years. As an organization, we have, at times, faced questions from residents about the relevance of STRs to the NLWC’s mission . The NLWC’s mission is to help preserve the long-term health of Nantucket’s environment and community through the protection of our land and water resources. Development impacts the environment. This simple fact should come as no surprise. Our actions on the land have a direct impact on the health of our waters. Nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus from septic systems and fertilizers, along with other contaminants such as those found in stormwater runoff, don’t just disappear. They travel through the soil and into our ponds, harbors, and drinking water. The accelerated development, repurposing of properties, and intensity of use associated with short-term rentals (STRs) as a business put increasing pressure on the island’s infrastructure, reduce habitat and biodiversity, and endanger our water quality. Of course, a community needs to change and develop and grow, but the health of our environment and the ability of a place to naturally support the people who live there are directly related to the intensity and type of development and growth that we, as a community, choose to allow and encourage. The NLWC has always made it clear that we are not opposed to all short-term rentals. We support the ability of island residents to short-term rent with reasonable restrictions. We have, first and foremost, sought to reduce the impact from investor-owned STRs, and reduce the intensity of use and development from properties that are maximized solely for the use of short-term rentals because of the cumulative environmental impacts that this type of use and development creates. We were very disappointed by the November STM vote, which resulted in the full codification of short-term rentals across all residential zoning districts of the island. It is clear that much of the community was incredibly alarmed by the simple messaging provided by Article 1 proponents that asserted this was a matter of maintaining an important property right or losing that right. Alternatively, we, as proponents of Article 2, attempted to communicate a more nuanced message that memorializing this right with reasonable restrictions would actually allow most residents to continue short-term renting in a meaningful way while helping to protect the future of our environment and community. As the dust settles, and our media expresses the reality of the inadequacy of our existing regulations ( https://nantucketcurrent.com/news/nantucket-banned-corporate-owned-short-term-rentals-a-loophole-is-allowing-them-to-continue ) , there is clearly more that needs to be done. All of our policies and practices relative to growth, development, and land and resource management , including STR regulations, must be scrutinized for their impact on our shared natural resources and adjusted where needed to protect the health of our environment and community. It is easy to make the claim that STRs as an issue is not “in our lane” and to suggest that how we use and develop our properties are somehow separate from: PFAS issues, contamination of our public water supply, nutrient pollution, and water conservation , but these are the exact concerns that compel the NLWC to engage in community conversations about growth, development, land use, and STRs. We are the voice for Nantucket’s environment, working to safeguard the present health and future sustainability of the island. This is our lane. We thank all of our members and friends for your support , regardless of your position or vote at STM. We know that, despite differences in opinion, we all share a deep care for this special place and a desire to protect what makes it unique. Together, we can shape policies that reflect both the needs of our community and the limits of our fragile island environment. Your willingness to stay engaged—ask questions, share concerns, and offer ideas—continues to strengthen our efforts. There is more work to do, and we look forward to doing that work with you.
By Anna Day October 27, 2025
At the upcoming Special Town Meeting on November 4th, Nantucket voters will once again consider how best to regulate short-term rentals (STRs). After years of debate, two competing proposals, Articles 1 and 2, offer very different paths forward. The Nantucket Land & Water Council (NLWC) supports Article 2 , which encourages sustainable use of island resources and provides a balanced, long-term solution. Click Here to read the NLWC’s recommendations on the warrant articles. Click Here to read our Letter to the Editor. Join Us and Vote Environment First! Tuesday, November 4 at 5:00 pm in the Mary P. Walker Auditorium of the Nantucket High School.
By Anna Day October 2, 2025
Last week, the appeal hearing for the Surfside Crossing 40B development was conducted remotely by the state’s Housing Appeals Committee (HAC). The NLWC participated as an intervening party to defend clean drinking water for Nantucket. The proposed 156 condo unit development on 13.6 acres known as Surfside Crossing (SSX) off of South Shore Rd is of inappropriate density (13 x the local zoning) and would compromise our drinking water supply. Following the comprehensive permit review by the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) that took place throughout last fall and winter, the application for SSX was unanimously denied by the ZBA. This denial was subsequently appealed to the state by the developers, Jamie Feeley and Josh Posner, in April of this year. During the comprehensive permit review last year by the ZBA, the NLWC hired an engineering expert and water quality specialist to review the project’s stormwater management plans. The review and testimony of these experts revealed that the stormwater infrastructure proposed for the Surfside Crossing development does not meet the specific state and local standards for projects within the Nantucket Wellhead Protection District (the area where groundwater contributes to the public water supply wells), or for projects that meet the state’s criteria as a Land Use of Higher Potential Pollutant Load (LUHPPL). Given recent public well contamination by elevated PFAS levels, it has become abundantly clear that these standards are incredibly important to uphold, especially for a project of this scale within our public water supply recharge area. The local ZBA agreed with the importance of protecting clean water , and asked the developers to address the stormwater management design to ensure that it meets state and local standards and protects not only the residents and direct abutters of the development, but the public water supply that we all share. Unfortunately, the developers refused to make any changes to their proposed design, in part because it would require a reduction in the number of units to make the necessary changes, and in part because they have already installed their stormwater infrastructure, “at risk”, without the benefit of a permit, and without a water quality certificate issued by the Water Commission as required in Nantucket’s Zoning Bylaw. They simply do not want to have to take it back out of the ground. Based on concerns for the health of the community’s drinking water, as well as other concerns relative to public safety and traffic, and considering the developers’ refusal to consider any changes whatsoever to their proposal, the ZBA unanimously denied the project. As an intervening party in the developers’ appeal of the ZBA’s decision, he NLWC has been working closely with the counsel for the Town of Nantucket’s ZBA, and the residents group, Tipping Point, to file written testimony from the NLWC’s engineer, the ZBA’s engineer, and several water quality and PFAS subject matter experts. During the HAC hearing last week, the developers’ counsel chose not to cross-examine any of these witnesses, and so their written testimony stands unchallenged, leaving the hearing office no basis to question their expert opinions. This hearing on the Surfside Crossing matter follows a similar appeal by developers in the Town of Walpole for a Chapter 40B development that was also denied by the Town’s ZBA due to similar concerns over improperly designed stormwater infrastructure, and the degradation of the Town of Walpole’s public water supply. As we await a decision from the HAC, we are grateful to Nantucket’s ZBA for their due diligence during the public hearing process, and for the opportunity to prepare for the appeal hearing in partnership with Town Counsel for the ZBA, as well as the residents’ group Tipping Point.  Stay Tuned for Updates!
MORE NEWS