NLWC News


2024 Special Town Meeting Recap

September 30, 2024

At this September’s Special Town Meeting, the Nantucket Land and Water Council once more encouraged Nantucket residents to vote for the environment by following its recommendations on many of the articles. This year’s Special Town Meeting saw debates continue over matters including short-term rentals (STRs) and zoning changes. The NLWC is pleased to report that nearly all of its recommendations were seen to fruition by Nantucket voters.


In the STR world, voters faced multiple competing proposals to regulate short-term rentals. Article 1, supported by the Select Board, aimed to legalize short-term rentals in all residential districts with limited restrictions. However, concerns about workarounds for the restrictions it did propose and ongoing investor incentives led to its defeat, with 472 votes against and 416 in favor. While the article proposed to impose a limit of one STR per person, an individual would still have the ability to set up any number of other legal entities (in the form of LLCs, trusts, etc) on their own or in partnership with others with each as the owner of separate STRs. As a result, this important provision would not have held water.


Article 2, proposed by Charity Benz and Nantucket Neighborhoods First (NNF), took a more restrictive approach, allowing short-term rentals only as an Accessory Use, requiring property owners to live in their homes more than they rent them. Nantucket Waterkeeper RJ Turcotte read a statement by NLWC president Lucy Leske in support of this article. While Article 2 didn’t pass, it gained significant support, receiving 478 votes in favor and 394 opposed, exceeding 55% approval but falling short of the two-thirds majority needed.


The strong backing for Article 2 reflects growing concern over the impact of short-term rentals on Nantucket’s environment and community.


Article 5, which the Nantucket Land and Water Council (NLWC) supported, was successfully passed. This amendment clarified and strengthened restrictions against corporate ownership of STRs.


Zoning changes which would have resulted in significant subdivision potential, as well as proposals for Town Sewer were also proposed in Articles 11,12,13 and 14 which affected 44 Skyline Drive, and 13/13A Woodland Ave. These changes were not supported by the NLWC because of the significant change in density they would have facilitated in addition to concerns around surrounding infrastructure impacts. The proponents of the articles presented all of them at Town Meeting as key elements in larger plans for affordable housing developments. However, the proponents of the articles did not clearly present their plans for the properties in advance of Town Meeting leaving many questions. This uncertainty and the degree of density proposed for these locations resulted in strong defeat across the board.


Town Meeting also voted strongly in favor of Article 16 which once again proposed to implement specific changes to the constitution of the Nantucket Planning & Economic Development Commission with the intention of creating a more dynamic and diverse planning commission to help the island navigate many of the bigger picture challenges we are facing.


Many thanks to all of our residents who came out to the Special Town Meeting to engage in these discussions and to vote!

July 16, 2026
On Monday, June 29th, 2026 , the Nantucket Land & Water Council (NLWC) in collaboration with Nantucket Harbormaster Sheila Lucey , Anderson’s Stillwater Moorings , & Nantucket Mooring s, officially began installing eelgrass-friendly moorings along our testing site in Nantucket Harbor. Installation has moved forward thanks to a generous grant from the Great Harbor Yacht Club Foundation to support eelgrass-friendly moorings in Nantucket Harbor. Eelgrass is paramount to maintaining the health and fragile ecosystems within our harbor . Eelgrass meadows aid our water quality by filtering out runoff contaminants , removing excess nutrients , providing necessary habitats for wild bay scallops and juvenile fish species , and helping to combat environmental events like coastal erosion and storm surge . Traditional moorings utilize a mushroom anchor and a heavy chain that digs into the harbor floor. As wind, tides, and currents move boats and moorings, the chain drags on the harbor floor creating a circular scour – a place where eelgrass cannot grow. Eelgrass-friendly moorings are a type of mooring that protects eelgrass meadows while allowing us to continue using and enjoying our boats as we always have. The eelgrass-friendly moorings use a pyramid style Dormor anchor and an ecorode elastic rope replacing traditional chain and mushroom anchors. The elastic does not scour, allowing eelgrass to grow sustainably in our harbors.
June 26, 2026
As a part of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Town of Nantucket and Vineyard Wind 1 , public comments were due on the Debris Infrastructure Failure Incident Response Plan Summary on Monday June 15th. The Nantucket Land & Water Council (NLWC) submitted a comment letter outlining the inappropriateness of providing a four page summary instead of the plan itself for the community to see, as well as deficiencies in the language provided and suggestions for improving it . That comment letter can be found here: NLWC VW1 Incident Plan Summary Comment Letter
June 12, 2026
The Massachusetts Senate recently passed S.3064 , known as the Mass Ready Act, a sweeping environmental bond bill that would invest over 3 billion dollars in climate resilience, water infrastructure, flood protection, PFAS remediation, conservation, and municipal environmental projects. Many of these investments align closely with priorities long championed by the Nantucket Land & Water Council, including funding for clean water infrastructure, climate adaptation, and the protection of natural resources. However, several amendments added to the bill during the Senate process have raised serious concerns among environmental organizations, municipalities, conservation commissions, and clean water advocates across Massachusetts. These provisions would weaken local municipal authority to protect wetlands and water resources and would disadvantage communities like ours that have adopted stronger environmental safeguards than just those required by state law. 
MORE NEWS